| 000 | 01263cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS51854 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u46981 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMarks & Spencer plc and others v Cox (VO) | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating Appeals _v(1994) 9 RA 258-295(19) |
||
| 520 | _aLT 13 May 1994. M and others held units within a shopping mall, divided into North and South areas. The units were assessed individually with reference to their location within the mall. M and others sought reductions in the gross value of their units because of lower pedestrian counts on their side of the mall, and submitted their own assessment. C agreed with the decisions of the valuation tribunal by comparing the assessments of a number of other properties in the area. Appeal allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPARABLES | ||
| 650 | _aMARKS & SPENCER PLC AND OTHERS V COX (VO) | ||
| 650 | _aPEDESTRIAN COUNTS | ||
| 650 | _aPEDESTRIAN FLOWS | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEALS | ||
| 650 | _aREDUCTION | ||
| 650 | _aSHOP UNITS | ||
| 650 | _aSHOPPING CENTRES | ||
| 650 | _aZONE A VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aZONING METHOD | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c29632 _d29632 |
||