000			01027cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS44439
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u47106
041			_aeng
245			_aDivall v Harrison and another
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 14 EG 108-111(4)
520			_aChD 17 December 1991. The main issue was the validity of a notice to quit . Two solicitors , executors of an estate, served the notice, which was on their firms`s headed notepaper and which wrongly named the landlord as the beneficiary of the estate. At that time the executors were the landlords; the beneficiary only being entitled to the land in equity until the completion of the administration of the estate. It was held that the notice was valid as the tenants had not been seriously misled.
650			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c29710 _d29710