| 000 | 00870cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS53527 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u4930 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aWeston, R. | ||
| 245 | 2 | _aA reasonable question | |
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v260(7908) 15 September 1995, 36(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the implications of the decision in "Ruxley Electronics & Construction v Forsyth" HL (Abs53197) (minor breach of specification for a private swimming pool), for large building contracts. | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF CONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aJCT 1980 CL2.1 | ||
| 650 | _aJCT 1980 CL27.2 | ||
| 650 | _aJARVIS V ROCKDALE HOUSING ASSOCIATION | ||
| 650 | _aRUXLEY ELECTRONICS & CONSTRUCTION V FORSYTH | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c2977 _d2977 |
||