000			01174cab a2200289 4500
001			WB3002-29
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u47494
041			_aeng
245			_aSmithfield meat market
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1993) EGCS 207(1) (8/1/94)
520			_a"R v City of London Corporation, ex parte Brewster" QBD 20 December 1993. An application for judicial review of the refurbishment of the meat market was refused. There was no evidence that tenants were unable to pay the higher rents to cover cost of compliance with EC hygiene regulations. The CLC were not trying to close the market; indeed they were fulfilling its duty to keep the market open.
650			_aCENTRAL MARKETS ACT 1860
650			_aEC REGULATIONS
650			_aHYGIENE
650			_aJUDICIAL REVIEW
650			_aMEAT MARKETS
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND REFURBISHMENT
650			_aRENTS
650			_aSMITHFIELD MEAT MARKET
650			_aTENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c29952 _d29952