000			01329cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS44555
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u47777
041			_aeng
245			_aGurton v Parrott and another
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 18 EG 161-165(2)
520			_aCA 11 December 1990. The case in the lower court revolved around the applicability of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s25 to the tenancy in dispute. The tenant (G) claimed that the tenancy was a protected residential one, so that the notice to quit served by the landlords (P) was null and void, and that she was protected by the Rent Act 1977 . The landlords, however, argued that the premises were being used for business purposes and so the 1954 Act should prevail. It was agreed that the outcome would be based on whether or not the tenancy was residential and the court found in the tenant`s favour. This decision was upheld later by the Court of Appeal and the appeal duly dismissed.
650			_aBUSINESS USE
650			_aKENNELS
650			_aPROTECTED TENANCIES
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c30093 _d30093