000			01579cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS44623
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u48063
041			_aeng
245			_aAndrews v Schooling and others
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v1991 CILL 675-676(2)
520			_aCA 25 February 1991. From April to August 1986 the first two defendants S & C owned adjacent semi-detached houses. In August the freehold was transferred to the third defendant M a company of which S & C were directors and works to convert the houses into flats was undertaken through subcontractors. In 1987 M granted the plaintiff, A, a 199-year lease of one flat which included a cellar . It was found that the flat suffered from penetrating dampness emanating from the cellar on which no extensive work had been done. A sued S, C & M on three grounds; breach of duty under Defective Premises Act 1972 s1, common law negligence and misrepresentation arising out of a reply to a precontract inquiry. A fourth defendant, a surveyor was sued for negligence and breach of contract but this was dropped before the hearing. At the first hearing A was awarded interim payment of £7,500 as evidence was sufficient to establish liability under Defective Premises Act. The defendants appeal was dismissed.
650			_aCONVERSION
650			_aDAMP COURSE
650			_aDEFECTIVE PREMISES ACT 1972 S1(1)
650			_aLAW CASE
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c30203 _d30203