000			01268cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS51871
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u48070
041			_aeng
245			_aSoS Environment v Euston Centre Investments Ltd
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) 48 EG 128-132(5)
520			_aCA 24 June 1994. The arbitrator in rent review proceedings published his award accepting that asbestos in the premises should have been removed by the tenant (E). E issued an originating notice of motion and summons seeking leave to appeal under Arbitration Act 1979 s1. Possible transfer to ChD was left in abeyance for nine months and transferred in March 1993. In November the landlord (S) served a notice of motion to dismiss the application for leave to appeal for want of prosecution. ChD gave this judgment. E appealed, highlighting the requirements of "Birkett v James" and that the deputy judge wrongly exercised his discretion to strike out. Appeal allowed.
650			_aARBITRATION ACT 1979
650			_aBIRKETT V JAMES
650			_aRENT REVIEWS
650			_aSOS ENVIRONMENT V EUSTON CENTRE INVESTMENTS LTD
690			_aARBITRATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c30208 _d30208