000			01425cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS44694
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u48561
041			_aeng
245			_aSood v Barker
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 23 EG 112-116(3)
520			_aCA 6 February 1991. On 20 October 1983 a lease was granted by the defendant, B, to the proprietor of a video shop , S, for nine years and under certain conditions including one restricting the use to video hire. In 1988 as the video business was not doing well S applied for and was granted a license to sell intoxicating liquor. In February 1989 B`s agents wrote complaining of a change of use without consent. Correspondence took place culminating in July 1989 with B claiming possession . At the first hearing it was held that there had been a breach of covenant and that the lease was therefore forfeit with no compensation. S appealed on the grounds that alcohol sales were less than 5% of his turnover, This was dismissed by the court. It was also held that B did not unreasonably withhold consent and no forfeiture money was due.
650			_aBEER SHOP
650			_aLAW CASE
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S146
650			_aOFF LICENCE
650			_aRESTRICTIVE USE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c30504 _d30504