000			01339cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS44696
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u48577
041			_aeng
245			_aFirst Leisure Trading Ltd v Dorita Properties Ltd
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 23 EG 116-126(6)
520			_aChD 15 November 1990. The plaintiffs F held a long lease on a public house and an adjoining property (the extension). The rent of the extension came up for review in December 1989 and was to be an open market rent . The lease contained a provision that the premises were only to be used as a extension to the pub. There was a disagreement over the rent and an arbitrator was called in. Problems arose as to whether F was a hypothetical tenant and whether those tenants bidding on the open market are restricted to those persons willing to take the risk of seeking and obtaining the permission of the pubs owner to use those premises as an extension. It was held that the arbitrator should not use F as a hypothetical tenant and that the bidding for the tenancy should not be restricted.
650			_aCROYDON CENTRE
650			_aGREYHOUND HOTEL
650			_aRENT REVIEW
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c30515 _d30515