000			01303cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS44760
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u48948
041			_aeng
245			_aConrath v Martin (VO)
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v(1991) 31 RVR 100-101(2)
520			_aLT 20 March 1991. The offices are in an area in which a series of major redevelopment and pedestrianisation works have taken place almost continuously since 1984. These works adversely affected the rental value of property in the vicinity, acknowledged by reductions in the rating assessment ranging from 5% to 30%. The ratepayer C held that during the period the property was unlettable although he had entered into the lease while the works were in progress. C claimed this was because he already occupied some of the property. C claimed that while the works were in progress it had been virtually impossible to trade from the property. C contended a reduction of 20%. LT held that there should be a reduction of 25% as although the property as badly affected C had been willing to lease the property himself.
650			_aALLOWANCES
650			_aRATING APPEAL
690			_aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c30701 _d30701