000			01372cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS44761
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u48952
041			_aeng
245			_aShaw v Hughes (VO)
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v(1991) 31 RVR 96-98(2)
520			_aLT 26 March 1991. The premises in question are a house which had a garage constructed within the curtilage but 30-40 feet north of the house. Until 1980 the house and the garage were separately occupied, the latter as a storage depot or warehouse . The two occupiers were separately assessed for rates. In 1985 the whole property was purchased by B who made a proposal to merge the two entries on the valuation list . This was agreed. In 1988 D sold the house to the plaintiff S but retained the garage and the rest of the curtilage as a building plot. D applied to have the valuation list changed on the grounds that "the hereditament as described ... has now ceased to exist". The VO`s objection was dismissed on the grounds that as currently stated S would be paying rates on property he did not own or inhabit.
650			_aALTERATION
650			_aDELETION FROM LIST
650			_aRATING APPEAL
650			_aSEPARATE ASSESSMENT
690			_aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c30702 _d30702