000			01607cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS44762
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u48956
041			_aeng
245			_aVoyle v Ashby (VO)
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v(1991) 31 RVR 101-102(2)
520			_aLT 5 April 1991. An appeal by the occupier V of a shop in a city centre against the decision of a valuation and community charge tribunal reducing their assessment from £9,555 rv to £7,409. The sole issue was the amount by which the assessment should be reduced due to building works connected with construction of a new shopping centre . A claimed £5,100 gv. A had occupied the hereditament temporarily while developers were finishing the permanent alternative accommodation . The disruption from building works included the boarding up of display windows to protect customers, the collapse of a basement wall and flooding, drains blocked by concrete, lack of access to rear of building, cutting off of mains water and electricity on occasions and the pavement being subject to excavations. The VO held that A had not suffered as badly as other people over the demolition work and supported a 12.5% allowance which was consistent with that allowed to other shops. LT held that 12.5% was not a big
650			_aDISABILITIES
650			_aLEICESTER
650			_aRATING APPEAL
650			_aREDUCTION
650			_aTEMPORARY OCCUPATION
650			_aTHE SHIRES
690			_aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c30704 _d30704