000			01638cab a2200301 4500
001			ABS53579
008			090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u5176
041			_aeng
245			_aCIN Properties Ltd v Rawlins and others
260			_c1995
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1995) 39 EG 148-151(4)
520			_aCA 1 February 1995. The appellant (C) holds a long lease of a shopping centre from a local authority which includes a number of internal pedestrian malls. These were not included on the plan of roads and paths expressly dedicated as public highways when the centre was created. The respondents (R) were banned from the shopping centre due to bad behaviour but they continued to frequent it. In proceedings by C seeking injunctions against R it was held that although the pedestrian malls were not subject to any walkway agreement, R had an equitable license to enter the centre. C appealed. Upheld on the grounds that C held its interest in the centre by a lease, and that provided for access to the centre by the public, it did not amount to a walkway agreement within Highways Act 1980 and therefore the pedestrian malls were not public highways.
650			_aEQUITABLE LICENCE TO ENTER
650			_aHIGHWAYS ACT 1980
650			_aPEDESTRIAN MALLS
650			_aPEDESTRIANISED AREAS
650			_aPUBLIC ACCESS
650			_aRIGHTS OF WAY
650			_aSHOPPING CENTRES
650			_aSWANSGATE SHOPPING CENTRE
650			_aWALKWAY AGREEMENT
650			_aWELLINGBOROUGH
690			_aHIGHWAYS AND RIGHTS OF WAY-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c3094 _d3094