| 000 | 01583cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS44861 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u49532 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aGreenwich LBC v Discreet Selling Estates Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1991) 61 PCR 405-436(17) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 20 June 1990. The plaintiffs G were lessors and the defendants D head lessees of seven shops with flats above. The lease contained a repairing covenant with powers of re-entry in the event of a breach. From 1974 there was failure to repair. G served notice under Law of Property Act 1925 s146 with an interim schedule of dilapidations . D served a counter notice under Leasehold Property (Repairs) Act 1938 and G accordingly applied for leave of the court before proceeding to enforce the right of re-entry . Leave was granted 16 months later. G continued to demand and receive the rent. G issued summons for possession and obtained judgement in their favour. D claimed the interim schedule was not sufficient and invalidated the notice; also that the demand for and acceptance of rent was a waiver of the right of forfeiture . CA dismissed the appeal on the grounds that the notice had only listed specific defects which would give grounds for forfeiture and there had been no improvement in th | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF COVENANT | ||
| 650 |
_aLANDLORD AND TENANT _96252 |
||
| 650 | _aLAW CASE | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c31002 _d31002 |
||