| 000 | 01186cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2826-32 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u49534 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aSunday trading ban | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aIndependent _v26 June 1992 |
||
| 490 |
_aFinancial Times _v26 June 1992, 8(3) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the implications for Sunday trading of the HL decision "Kirklees BC v Wickes Building Supplies Ltd" HL 25 June 1992 which overturned a CA decision to allow a local authority to obtain an interlocutory injunction to restrain a retailer from trading on Sundays in breach of Shops Act 1950 s47 without giving an undertaking on damages. Further consideration is given to the meaning of this decision if the case goes before the European Court of Justice. Outlines the timetable of legal judgments so far. | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aDIY | ||
| 650 | _aEC LAW | ||
| 650 | _aEUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE | ||
| 650 | _aINJUNCTIONS | ||
| 650 | _aSHOPS ACT 1950 S47 | ||
| 650 | _aSUNDAY TRADING | ||
| 650 | _aTORFAEN BC V B&Q | ||
| 690 | _aLAW-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c31003 _d31003 |
||