000			01377cab a2200241 4500
001			WB2810-41
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u49810
041			_aeng
245			_aConservation area
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1992 EGCS 23(2) (29 February 1992)
520			_a"R v Canterbury CC ex parte Halford" QBD 18 February 1992. An application for judicial review on the designation of a conservation area. The orginal designation had been made in 1971. In 1991 the council (C) had enlarged the designated area to include the applicant owner (H)`s land. H argued that C had acted unlawfully on the grounds that a conservation area must have a feature of architectural and historical interest, the character and appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance under Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 s69. C argued that a setting is part of the character. As there is no statutory redress for challenging the legality of a designation, application for judicial review allowed.
650			_aAPPEARANCE
650			_aCHARACTER
650			_aCONSERVATION AREAS
650			_aPLANNING LISTED BUILDINGS AND CONSERVATION AREAS ACT 1990
650			_aSETTING
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c31191 _d31191