000			01318cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS50689
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u5227
041			_aeng
245			_aPellicano and another v MEPC plc and another
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) 19 EG 138-141(4)
520			_aChD 16 February 1994. P was an underlessor of part of a building assigned to L and continued to pay rent to L`s receivers when L entered financial difficulties. When L went into liquidation P ceased paying rent but then received a distress notice requiring payment direct to the landlord (M). The liquidator disclaimed the lease and both L and P sought vesting orders under the Insolvency Act 1986 s181(2). M eventually re-entered the building. P disputed the forfeiture and sought an order for possession, claiming M`s right to forfeit was suspended pending the outcome of the vesting order application. The court disagreed, upholding M`s right to be unaffected.
650			_aDISCLAIMER
650			_aFORFEITURE
650			_aINSOLVENCY ACT 1986 S181(2)
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S146(4)
650			_aLEASES
650			_aTRESPASS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c3121 _d3121