000			01391cab a2200229 4500
001			Z2939
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u50049
041			_aeng
245			_aNorwich and Peterborough Building Society v Steed (No2)
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aAll England Law Reports _v(1993) 1 All ER 330-348(9)
520			_aCA 5 March 1992. The appellant`s house was fraudulently conveyed to relatives who then borrowed, and defaulted on, a mortgage from the respondent N. From the loan the relatives had paid off the local authority charge leaving N registered as charge holder. N obtained a possession order for the house but S, who had joined the proceedings successfully appealled to set it aside on the grounds that the conveyance was based on a forgery. A retrial was ordered to establish the facts of the conveyance. Forgery was dropped as a defence and S relied on a plea of non est factum. This failed and the judge concluded that the transfer was not void, merely avoidable. he ordered the proprietorship register be rectified but not the charges register. S`s appeal to the CA was dismissed.
650			_aFRAUD
650			_aLAND CHARGES REGISTER
650			_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 1925 S82(1)
650			_aPOWER OF ATTORNEY
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c31285 _d31285