000			00974cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS45006
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u50320
041			_aeng
245			_aBaglarbasi and another v Deedmethod Ltd
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 29 EG 137-145(5)
520			_aChD 14 December 1990. Concerns the validity of a section 25 notice, which the tenants claimed was invalid as the landlords had already forfeited the lease and that according to Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s25(5) the notice must require the tenant to serve a counternotice; in this case no counternotice was required. The court rejected such a literal interpretation of section 25 and made an order for possession to the landlords.
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
650			_aFORFEITURE
650			_aLEASES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c31404 _d31404