| 000 | 00786cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS45010 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u50348 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aWyndham Investments Ltd v Motorway Tyres and Accessories Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 30 EG 65-68(3) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 28 January 1991. It was held that a fall back provision in a lease should be invoked, which allowed the rent review, originally calculated with reference to the RPI, to be settled by arbitration if the RPI ceased to be published. Invocation was caused by the RPI having been rebased during the term of the lease. | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c31420 _d31420 |
||