000			01107cab a2200253 4500
001			WB2746-20
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u50379
041			_aeng
245			_aAssignment of tenancy
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aTimes _v22 November 1991, 19(1)
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1991 EGCS 124(1) (7/12/91)
520			_a"Crago v Julian" CA 21 November 1991. It was held that a tenancy had to be assigned in writing; an oral agreement was only sufficient for a short-term lease. The appeal against the decision that the appellant`s ex-husband had not assigned the tenancy to her in spite of written intentions to do so, was dismissed with reference to Law of Property Act 1925 s53(1)(a).
650			_aASSIGNMENT
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S53(1)(A)
650			_aLEASES
650			_aORAL AGREEMENT
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c31438 _d31438