| 000 | 01039cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS45052 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u50685 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aWalford and others v Miles and another | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 27 EG 114-123; 28 EG 81-86(9) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 19 December 1991. The CA was divided over interpretation of an oral agreement that vendors of a business would not enter negotiations with a third party but deal exclusively with the plaintiff purchasers. A majority of the court found this to be unenforceable as merely an agreement to enter a contract but one judge dissented, finding that the agreement not to negotiate with anyone else was severable from the agreement merely to negotiate and therefore enforceable. | ||
| 650 | _aMISREPRESENTATION | ||
| 650 | _aPHOTOGRAPHIC PROCESSING | ||
| 650 | _aVENDOR AND PURCHASER | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c31632 _d31632 |
||