| 000 | 01130cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3131-72 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u52003 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aComparables in fair rents | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _v9 August 1995, 26(1) |
||
| 520 | _aIn "Spath Holme v Greater Manchester and Lancashire Rent Assessment Committee", CA 19 July 1995, it was held that when determining fair rents in respect of flats let on regulated tenancies a rent assessment committee erred in law in failing to appreciate that a fair rent was the market rent, and in concluding that assured tenancy rents for identical flats in the same block could not be used for comparables. Appeal by Greater Manchester Rent Committee dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aASSURED TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aFAIR RENTS | ||
| 650 | _aMARKET RENTS | ||
| 650 | _aRENT ACT 1977 | ||
| 650 | _aSCARCITY | ||
| 650 | _aSPATH HOLME LTD V GREATER MANCHESTER AND LANCASHIRE RENT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c32259 _d32259 |
||