000			01696cab a2200277 4500
001			ABS45284
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u52067
041			_aeng
245			_aBristol & West Building Society v Marks & Spencer plc
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 41 EG 139-147(3)
520			_aChD 14 December 1990. M&S had a large store in the centre of Reading bounded on one side by an arcade. M&S took a lease of the premises at the far end of the arcade. These formed only a small part of the whole of the M&S store, the rest of which they held as freehold. The premises on the arcade had doors which gave access to it. M&S was seen as a flagship store which brought in business. M&S claims that the arcade had deteriorated and shops were no longer being let easily. They also noted that the number of people using the arcade entrance represented less than 10% of people entering the store. They also suspected that the growing number of thefts in the shop were committed by people using the arcade entrance. They decided to shut the doors permanently from 4 October 1990. There was immediate protest from shopkeepers in the arcade. A clause in the lease said that tenants should `at all times observe and conform to all rules ... made by the lessors for the management of the said arcad
650			_aACCESS
650			_aDOORS
650			_aFLAGSHIP STORE
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT _96252
650			_aLEASE TERMS
650			_aMARKS AND SPENCER
650			_aRETAIL PROPERTY
650			_aSHOPPING ARCADES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c32300 _d32300