| 000 | 00922cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3115-50 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u52079 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRebutting presumption of advancement | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _v13 April 1995, 36(1) |
||
| 520 | _aIn "McGrath v Wallis", CA 10 March 1995, it was held that where a house had acquired for joint occupation but was conveyed into the name of only one of the occupants, the equitable presumption of advancement was to be considered as a judicial instrument of last resort. Not only in cases between husband and wife but also in those between father and child the presumption was rebuttable by comparatively slight evidence. | ||
| 650 | _aCONVEYANCING | ||
| 650 | _aPRESUMPTION OF ADVANCEMENT | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c32307 _d32307 |
||