000			01655cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS45290
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u52110
041			_aeng
245			_aKaye v Massbetter Ltd and another
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 39 EG 129-132(3)
520			_aCA 5 December 1990. The premises were a flat in London Docklands. The landlord, K, wished to rent it out and showed X round with a view to this. K wished to let to a company rather than an individual. X did not have a company so K suggested buying one. X was a discharged bankrupt so two of his friends bought the company, M, for his benefit. X signed the tenancy agreement on behalf of the landlord and there is only one signature. In 1989 it was agreed there should be an extension on a monthly basis. In September 1989 notice to quit was served on M and in November possession proceedings began. X claimed that the letting to the company was a sham and that in reality the flat had been let to him and even if the original letting had been to the company the extension had been to him personally. The court held this not to be the case; it had been clear that K had only been prepared to let to a company and was therefore doing so in good faith. X appealed. This was dismissed on the grounds th
650			_aCASE LAW
650			_aCOMPANY LETS
650			_aFLATS
650			_aRENT ACTS
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c32328 _d32328