| 000 | 00997cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2618-47 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u52224 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aGreen belt | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEGCS _v1990 58 |
||
| 520 | _aIn R v SoS for the Environment and another ex parte Pehrsson , CA 26 April 1990, it was held that the inspector had failed to give adequate reasons for concluding that the proposed use was not appropriate for the green belt , failing to give consideration to the nature of the residential use sought, namely restricted to staff accommodation and is respect of which the appellant had agreed the terms of a section 52 agreement . | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING POLICY GUIDANCE NOTE 2 | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING POLICY GUIDANCE NOTE 7 | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING POLICY GUIDANCE NOTE 2 (GREEN BELTS) | ||
| 650 | _aPPG7 | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c32394 _d32394 |
||