000			01748cab a2200277 4500
001			ABS45334
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u52403
041			_aeng
245			_aSafeway Properties Ltd v SoS for the Environment and Greenwich LBC
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1991 JPL 966-973(4)
520			_aCA 14 June 1991. By a decision letter dated 1 August 1989, the SoS refused outline consent for development of a former MoD site as a superstore, petrol filling station and ancillary development. At the public inquiry the Inspector considered the `effect upon the residential amenities of local people` of the superstore proposal. He held that it was likely to bring a greater volume of traffic to the area and it would cause disturbance for local people in the quiet enjoyment of their homes. The appellants, S, were dissatisfied with the manner in which the inspector had dealt with their offer to provide financial assistance for implementation of Traffic Management Measures (TMM) which they claimed would alleviate the problem. They contended the TMM would constitute a planning gain. S took this point to HC and it was dismissed. CA held that the inspector had been wrong to exclude consideration of S`s offer, as he had misinterpreted DoE Circular 22/83, which defined planning gain. S had no
650			_aCIRCULAR 22/83
650			_aPLANNING APPEALS
650			_aPLANNING GAIN
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aQUIET ENJOYMENT
650			_aSUPERSTORES
650			_aTRAFFIC MANAGEMENT MEASURES
650			_aTRAFFIC
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c32476 _d32476