000			01645cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS45336
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u52417
041			_aeng
245			_aVision Engineering Ltd v SoS Environment and Guildford BC
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1991 JPL 951-956(3)
520			_aQBD 18 January 1991. The applicants, V, carried on a high tech business from factory premises in green belt. V applied for outline planning permission to construct a two-storey extension for ancillary office space (appeal A) and a single storey extension for the same purpose (appeal B). V also applied for consent for vehicle access to a new unit under construction (appeal C). The inspector allowed appeal C but dismissed A and B. The decision letter indicated that the main issues were whether there were special circumstances to outweigh presumption against development in green belt and the effects of the proposal on neighbouring amenities in terms of noise, disturbance and outlook. The court compared this case with two other recent ones "Stewart v SoS Environment and Vale Royal DC" and "Pehrsson v SoS Environment and the Council of the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead". It was held that the proposed development was not inappropriate to the green belt and the decision letter cou
650			_aEXTENSION
650			_aGREEN BELT
650			_aINAPPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT
650			_aPLANNING APPEALS
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c32481 _d32481