000			01553cab a2200229 4500
001			Z3414
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u52890
041			_aeng
245			_aRobins and another v Tupman and another
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aStructural Survey _v11(4) Spring 1993, 401-408(8)
520			_aCA 19 October 1992. R claimed nuisance and negligence against neighbours T for installing an inadequate drainage system which leaked onto R`s land. In 1978 the common owner Miss Blenham B conveyed the house, garden and northern part of land including septic tank but not the soakaway to T. The conveyance did not contain any express grant of an easement of drainage from the septic tank to a soakaway on another part of the land. In 1978, B conveyed another part of the land to R. R built a bungalow and garage and after severed the drain from T`s septic tank and requested them to stop using the system. T constructed an alternative system in 1982 and their claim for £2,358.69 to cover the cost from R was allowed. From 1984, R complained of problems arising from the new system. CA dismissed R`s claim on the grounds that it was R`s obstruction of easement of drainage which was the cause of the nuisance. It was recognised that T had taken reasonable steps to rectify the problem by installing
650			_aDRAINAGE
650			_aEASEMENTS
650			_aNUISANCE
650			_aOBSTRUCTION
690			_aHIGHWAYS AND RIGHTS OF WAY-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c32642 _d32642