| 000 | 01132cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS45466 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u53160 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMayhew v Free Grammar School of John Lyon | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v1991 45 EG 175-180(4) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 21 May 1991. An appeal by landlord (F) against a cc decision allowing the tenant (M) to serve a second notice concerning a reduction of the rateable value in preparation for acquiring the freehold of premises under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. CA upheld the "Pollock v Brook Shepherd" principle that the timetable laid down in Housing ACt 1974 Sched 8 to facilitate a tenant to apply for the rateable value to be reduced in order to purchase the freehold under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 was mandatory. Appeal allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aFREEHOLD | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 | ||
| 650 | _aPOLLOCK V BROOK SHEPHERD | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-LEASEHOLD REFORM | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c32790 _d32790 |
||