000			01575cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS45468
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u53174
041			_aeng
245			_aNorris v Checksfield
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aAll England Law Reports _v1991 All ER 327-334(8)
520			_aCA 17 October 1991. An appeal by tenant Checksfield (C) against a possession order awarded to N for a bungalow occupied in return for services to his employer. C argued that an employee occupying premises not beneficial directly to his occupation was a protected tenant rather than a mere licencee and that a service occupancy was a periodic licence in respect of which requirements as to the giving of notice in Protection of Eviction Act 1977 s5(1A)a applied. Held firstly that exclusive occupation of an employer`s residential premises by an employee in anticipitation that the employees work would at some time be beneficial to his employer created a licence not a tenancy. Secondly, termination of a licence which ended with termination of employment did not have to comply with s(1) of the 1971 Act since employment is not a periodic licence. Possession order upheld; appeal dismissed. Leave to appeal to the House of Lords refused.
650			_aLICENCES
650			_aPOSSESSION
650			_aPROTECTED TENANCIES
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c32798 _d32798