| 000 | 01102cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS45495 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u53387 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aFletcher v Chelmsford BC | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v1991 45 EG 191-192(2) |
||
| 520 | _aLT (REF/6/1991) 22 July 1991. Claim for compensation under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s174 (1990 Act s203) for the cost of taking expert advice and monitoring a tree, subject to a tree preservation order, which was causing structural danger to a house. C claimed that any loss was too remote to be compensatable. Refers to "Bollans v Surrey" 1968. LT ruled that the claimant had acted reasonably in taking expert advice. Claim for cost of report and monitoring allowed in full. | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPENSATION | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S174 | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S203 | ||
| 650 | _aTREE PRESERVATION ORDERS (TPOs) | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c32911 _d32911 |
||