000			01148cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS45601
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u53921
041			_aeng
245			_aFischer v Toumazos
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 48 EG 123-129(4)
520			_aCA 25 June 1991. The CA overturned an earlier decision, which awarded damages in favour of the purchaser of a leasehold interest in a property, where she was unable to begin trading because the vendor of the lease was unable to obtain the landlord`s consent to assignment and change of use. The sale was not completed but the purchaser occupied the premises and did not pay rent, thereby making the property "sterile". It was held that the vendor used his best endeavours to achieve an assignment of the lease and damages should be paid by the purchaser.
650			_aBREACH OF CONTRACT
650			_aCOMPLETION
650			_aPOSSESSION
650			_aPROPERTY SALES
650			_aVENDOR AND PURCHASER
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c33100 _d33100