| 000 | 00716cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS51999 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u54256 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aSayer, R. | ||
| 245 | _aProposal breaks up the parties | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aLaw Society`s Gazette _v91(45) 7 December 1994, 12(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses "Clark Boyce v Mouat" (1993) 4 All ER 268 used as an argument for separate representation, and claims that the decision is not relevant. | ||
| 650 | _aCLARK BOYCE V MOUAT | ||
| 650 | _aCONVEYANCING | ||
| 650 | _aSEPARATE REPRESENTATION | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c33257 _d33257 |
||