| 000 | 01051cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2442-37 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u54301 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aInstructed to prepare a valuation? | ||
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aChartered Surveyor Weekly _vvol 25 no 3 20/10/88 p84 |
||
| 520 | _aIn British Tissues Ltd v Salisbury Hamer Aspden and Johnson and the Shepherd Gilmour Partnership High Court, the plaintiff brought a claim against a firm of surveyors / valuers and a firm of consulting engineers alleging that it had acquired a leasehold property, in reliance on the surveyors` initial and full reports and had subsequently found defects which should have been found on inspection and reported to it. The case examines rules with regard to payment into court . | ||
| 650 | _aBUILDING DEFECTS | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aSTRUCTURAL SURVEYS | ||
| 650 |
_aValuation _96273 |
||
| 690 | _aPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c33281 _d33281 |
||