| 000 | 00999cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS45658 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u54303 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aWestminster CC v Woodbury (VO) and another | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 48 EG 129-136(5) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 3 July 1991. The appeal against the LT decision that a restaurant boat, permanently anchored to the river bed of the Thames, was not rateable, was dismissed; the river bed, owned by the Port of London, was by statute not rateable. Even if the boat was occupying rateable land, namely the embankment, the proposal would still be invalidated by also occupying land, which is exempt. | ||
| 650 | _aCHATTELS | ||
| 650 | _aHISPANIOLA | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEALS | ||
| 650 | _aRESTAURANT BOATS | ||
| 650 | _aVESSEL | ||
| 650 | _aYARD ARM CLUB LTD | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c33283 _d33283 |
||