000			01400cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS45700
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u54602
041			_aeng
245			_aNitrigin Eireann Teoranta v Inco Alloys Ltd
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v(1991) CILL 707-709(3)
520			_aThe defendants (I) supplied N with steel alloy tubing which subsequently cracked and was repaired by them, though the cause was not distinguished. A year later the pipe burst, causing an explosion and damage to surrounding plant. N sued for damages claiming I had been negligent. The defence argued the the action was statute-barred as the plaintiffs had a cause of action in 1983, following the example of the Pirelli v Oscar Faber case. N countered, contending that their cause of action was acquired at the later date, after damage to equipment other than the pipe was incurred. Consideration of other cases, such as D & F Estates v Church Commissioners and Murphy v Brentwood DC led the court to decide in favour of N.
650			_aCAUSE OF ACTION
650			_aJUNIOR BOOKS
650			_aMANUFACTURERS
650			_aNEGLIGENCE
650			_aSUPPLIERS
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c33473 _d33473