000			01254cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS45712
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u54679
041			_aeng
245			_aBatchelor v Kent CC
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(9203) 25 January 1992, 127-129(3)
520			_aWrangling over compensation for land used as a roundabout junction, and granting access to a development area, revolved around the availability of other options. The claimant (B) took the land to be the `key` to the whole area of development and thus sought £21.09m. K maintained there were alternative sites for the junction and offered £75,000. Whilst recognising that the chosen site was the best available, the tribunal noted there were others and arrived at an intermediate sum of £2.15m.
650			_aACCESS LAND
650			_aCompulsory purchase _96228
650			_aLAND COMPENSATION ACT 1961 S5
650			_aLAND COMPENSATION ACT 1973 S53
650			_aRANSOM VALUE
650			_aSTOKES PRINCIPLE
650			_aSTOKES V CAMBRIDGE
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c33522 _d33522