| 000 | 01225cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS45727 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u54783 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aAttorney General (ex rel Yorkshire Derwent Trust Ltd and another) v Brotherton and others | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aAll England Law Reports _v(1992) 1 All ER 230-256(14) |
||
| 520 | _aHL 5 December 1991. Pursuing a policy of re-establishing the River Derwent as a navigable waterway, AG sued B and other bankside landowners opposing the move, on behalf of YDT and Malton town council, in an attempt to declare a public right of way. Envoked in support was the Rights of Way Act 1932 s1. The key question was whether land covered by water could conform to the definition of land in the Act. At trial, it was decided that navigation rights were not considered rights of way. AG appealed and won, so B took the case to the Lords where the initial judgement was reinstated. | ||
| 650 | _aNAVIGATION RIGHTS | ||
| 650 | _aPUBLIC HIGHWAYS | ||
| 650 | _aRIGHTS OF WAY ACT 1932 S1 | ||
| 650 | _aRIVERS | ||
| 690 | _aHIGHWAYS RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c33576 _d33576 |
||