000			00964cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS45745
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u54872
041			_aeng
245			_aLand v Sykes and another
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(9203) 25 January 1992, 115-120(5)
520			_aCA 11 October 1991. The appeal was made by the executors of S, the late defendant and tenant in a notice to quit case. S had claimed that his Case E notice was invalid by reason of a severance of the reversion. S in the meantime died and a Case G notice was served. Dispute over the legitimacy of the notices was decided in favour of the landlord (L), and upheld by the CA.
650			_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1986 SCH 3
650			_aCARRADINE PROPERTIES LTD V ASLAM
650			_aNOTICE TO QUIT
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c33618 _d33618