| 000 | 01074cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS45750 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u54890 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLetters of intent and comfort | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9204) 1 February 1992, 143-144(2) |
||
| 520 | _aA `Mainly for Students` article which distinguishes between the two types of letter and cites appropriate case law. | ||
| 650 | _aBRITISH STEEL CORP V CLEVELAND BRIDGE & ENGINEERING CO LTD | ||
| 650 | _aCOURTNEY & FAIRBAIRN LTD V TOLAINI BROTHERS (HOTELS) LTD | ||
| 650 | _aESSO PETROLEUM CO LTD V MARDON | ||
| 650 | _aHILLAS & CO LTD V ARCOS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aINTENTION | ||
| 650 | _aKLEINWORT BENSON LTD V MALAYSIA MINING CORPORATION BERHAD | ||
| 650 | _aLETTERS OF COMFORT | ||
| 650 | _aLETTERS OF INTENT | ||
| 650 | _aRE WALTON ON THE NAZE UDC AND MORAN (1905) HUDSON | ||
| 650 | _aTROLLOPE & COLLS LTD V ATOMIC POWER CONSTRUCTIONS LTD | ||
| 690 | _aLAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c33625 _d33625 |
||