000			01133cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS45787
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u55053
041			_aeng
245			_aGran Gelato Ltd v Richcliff (Group) Ltd and others
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aNew Law Journal _v(1992) 6535 NLJ 51-52(2)
520			_aChD 10 December 1991. The plaintiffs (G) purchased a 10-year underlease, unaware of a redevelopment break clause contained in the headlease, despite having applied to the vendor`s solicitor (second defendant). When the clause was invoked by the headlessors, G sued R and solicitors for damages under the Misrepresentation Act 1967, and for negligence. At issue in the claim was whether a seller`s solicitor owes a duty of care to the buyer. It was "held" that it was not so, and arguments that G`s claim was a special case were rejected. Case dismissed.
650			_aBREAK CLAUSES
650			_aDUTY OF CARE
650			_aSOLICITORS
650			_aVENDOR AND PURCHASER
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c33673 _d33673