| 000 | 00926cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2843-22 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u55217 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMeaning of `building owner` | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1992) EGCS 122 (2) (31/10/92) |
||
| 520 | _a"Lehmann and another v Herman" ChD 16 October 1992. A party wall notice served under London Building Acts (Amendment) Act 1939 s47 on behalf of only one of the building owners was held to be invalid. The definition of building owner was considered. | ||
| 650 | _aBUILDING OWNERS | ||
| 650 | _aGARDEN WALL | ||
| 650 | _aJOINT TENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aLONDON BUILDING ACTS (AMENDMENT) ACT 1939 S47 | ||
| 650 | _aPARTY WALL NOTICES | ||
| 650 |
_aParty walls _96258 |
||
| 690 | _aHIGHWAYS AND RIGHTS OF WAY-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c33738 _d33738 |
||