| 000 | 01304cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS53659 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u5683 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aSneesby and another v Goldings | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1995) 36 EG 136-141 (6) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 6 December 1994. In 1985 the plaintiffs (S) purchased a former bakery with a mortgage from the Leeds Permanent Building Society. Before purchase, the building society commissioned the defendants (G) to provide a valuation report for £30. G pointed out in writing that the valuation was limited and advised the Leeds to obtain a more detailed, more expensive report - the RICS "House buyers report and valuation". In the court below, it was held that G was negligent for failing to report a missing chimney breast hidden behind a cupboard. G appealed contending that the standards imposed by the judge were too high. Appeal dismissed. S cross-appealed. Appeal allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aDIMINUTION IN VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aMORTGAGE VALUATION REPORT | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aRICS HOMEBUYER SURVEY AND VALUATION | ||
| 650 | _aSNEESBY AND ANOTHER V GOLDINGS | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c3391 _d3391 |
||