000			01485cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS45895
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u55769
041			_aeng
245			_aIDC Group Ltd and others v Clark and others
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 08 EG 108-111(4)
520			_aChD 25 June 1991. The plaintiffs D were leaseholders and freeholders of the property in question, who brought an action against C, sublessee of a flat in adjoining premises. The action relates to an agreement in a deed which provided for a fire escape route from the fourth floor of the premises through the party wall into the area of the fifth floor now occupied by C`s flat. The deed had been made between predecessors in title. At some stage the doorway was blocked, it is not known when or by whom, and the route for the fire escape was blocked. D brought proceedings against C to seek mandatory injunctions to open the doorway and damages in lieu. However at great expense C provided an alternative fire escape route so D only claimed damages. C claimed that the 1969 agreement was not binding as it was a personal one which they had not been party to and had not been informed of at purchase. This was upheld.
650			_a22 ST JAMESS SQUARE
650			_aEASEMENTS
650			_aFIRE ESCAPE
650			_aRIGHT OF WAY
690			_aHIGHWAYS AND RIGHTS OF WAY-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c34091 _d34091