000 01642cab a2200361 4500
001 ABS45924
008 090401t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035 _a(Sirsi) u55922
041 _aeng
100 _aMcLoughlin, P.
245 _aReviewing rents: hypothesis, reality and commercial purpose
260 _c12(2) Winter 1991/92, 115-122(8)
350 _a0
490 _aRent Review & Lease Renewal
_v12(2) Winter 1991/92, 115-122(8)
520 _aWith reference to case law, this article examines the purpose of rent reviews, discussing hypothesis v presumption of reality, disregards as to rent and the length of term of the hypothetical lease.
650 _aBASINGSTOKE AND DEANE BC V HOST GROUP LTD
650 _aBRITISH GAS CORPORATION V UNIVERSITIES SUPERANNUATION SCHEME
650 _aEQUITY AND LAW LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY PLC V BODFIELD LTD
650 _aLYNNTHORPE ENTERPRISES LTD V SIDNEY SMITH (CHELSEA) LTD
650 _aNATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC V ARTHUR YOUNG MCLELLAND MOORES AND CO
650 _aNORWICH UNION LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY V TRUSTEE SAVINGS BANKS CENTRAL BOARD
650 _aPEARL ASSURANCE PLC V SHAW
650 _aPUGH V SMITHS INDUSTRIES LTD
650 _aRENT REVIEWS
650 _aRITZ HOTEL (LONDON) LTD V RITZ CASINO LTD
650 _aSI PENSION TRUSTEES LTD V MINISTERIO DE MARINA DE LA REPUBLICA PERUANA
650 _aTEA TRADE PROPERTIES LTD V CIN PROPERTIES LTD
650 _aLAW LAND CO LTD V CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION LTD
650 _aTOMLINSON (VO) V PLYMOUTH ARGYLE FOOTBALL CO LTD
690 _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS
942 _n0
948 _c04/03/1997
999 _c34173
_d34173