| 000 | 01586cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS45933 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u55962 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aHagee (London) Ltd v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 06 EG 122-126(4) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 19 July 1991. The plaintiff H was tenant of three shops under a lease dated 6 November 1984 for a term of 25 years. The defendant, C was the grantor of the lease and immediate landlord. In March 1989 C gained planning permission to redevelop an area of which the premises formed the eastern edge. Two of the buildings were Grade II listed buildings. H agreed in the lease not to make structural alterations or additions, not to cut main walls or timbers and not to contravene listed building law. The lease also contained a covenant for reentry on breach of covenant. In 1989 it was decided to replace the airconditioning system. No leave was sought from C or any other bodies such as English Heritage or local authorities. The works were noted and reported to C who decided to do nothing, but C did stop accepting the rent. It is believed that C, who needed the property for redevelopment hoped that a breach of covenant would occur and a forfeiture be possible. On 20 December 1989 a notice w | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF COVENANT | ||
| 650 | _aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S146 | ||
| 650 | _aLISTED BUILDINGS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c34188 _d34188 |
||