000			01485cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS45934
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u55968
041			_aeng
245			_aMontross Associated Investments SA v Moussaieff
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1992) 63 PCR 31-37(8)
520			_aCA 27 June 1991. The defendants M carried on business as a jewellery shop in the foyer of the Hilton Hotel. Leases of two premises in Park Lane were assigned to them and negotiations resulted in a single lease. By a clause in that lease M covenanted not to use the premises for certain purposes and to use them for the business of high class retailers. M never occupied one of the properties and used the other for storage and administration of the jewellers. The plaintiffs alleged that this was a breach of covenant. At the first hearing it was held that there was no breach however the landlords appealed. The appeal was dismissed on the grounds that the premises were used for the business of high class retailers and the omission to use the second is not a breach as the two premises having been let as a whole should be viewed as a whole.
650			_aBREACH OF COVENANT
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
650			_aJEWELLERS
650			_aRESTRICTED USE
650			_aUSER COVENANTS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c34190 _d34190