000			01754cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS45936
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u55973
041			_aeng
245			_aIceland Frozen Foods plc v Starlight Investments Ltd
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 07 EG 117-118(2)
520			_aCA 16 December 1991. Concerned the construction of the rent review clause in a lease. An appeal by the defendant landlord, S, from an order on the hearing of an originating summons seeking a declaration as to the meaning of rent review provisions. The premises were divided into two units; one occupied by the tenant, the other a subtenant. The lease provided for five-yearly rent reviews to an open market rent, being the best yearly rack-rent at which the premises might reasonably be expected to be let as a whole or in parts and assuming, if not in fact, that the premises remain in existence and be ready for immediate occupation and use. S had two principal contentions as to the correct construction of the clause. 1) the ground floor may be regarded as divided or capable of division into seven units and that the tenants may be prepared to pay higher rent as they might get consent for the subdivision, paying a continuous rent but on the basis the tenant would be carrying out the convers
650			_aCONSTRUCTION OF CLAUSE
650			_aNORWICH UNION LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY V TRUSTEE SAVINGS BANK CENTRAL BO
650			_aORCHID LODGE (UK) LTD V EXTEL COMPUTING LTD
650			_aRENT REVIEWS
650			_aTRUSTHOUSE FORTE ALBANY HOTELS LTD V DAEJAN INVESTMENTS LTD
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c34192 _d34192